Sunday, October 11, 2015

Thesis Brief

DIA 2015/2016

Thesis Studio

Prof. Ivan Kucina

City Commons

Thesis Subject

This project integrates spatial and social aspects of urban regeneration by connecting two relevant issues: renewal of the abandoned historical buildings/spaces and their transformation into city commons. Rather than restoration and simple provision of the old buildings through new usage, it promotes the transformation of unused spaces into places for collaboration, sharing, collective ownership, and cooperative economy. It claims for the social interaction among engaged citizens that are managing commons as a device for the equitable and sustainable redevelopment of their city.
Studies of the city commons have resulted in a range of definitions. In this project a more design-centric definition of the concept will be used, one that connects the city commons to the complex, systemic, and democratic features of urban and architectural space. Depending on the scale, commons are related to left-over plots or unused buildings, depending on ownership commons could occupy abandoned private properties or wasted public spaces, depending on management, commons could be developed by the city authorities, civic organizations or altruistic individuals.
Creating situations of social interaction that transform unused spaces is a critical position assumed in this project. A rise in city commons hopes to reclaim the city for the public good, providing a participatory alternative to exclusive market-based speculations. When commons does occur, it can overflow deprived context in which it is taking place, generating emergent and vibrant environment.

http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2653084

Collaboration

During the year students will transform unused historical buildings and left-over plots to facilitate civic organizations, collective enterprises, and cooperatives in two post-socialist cities in central Europe – Leipzig (in the winter semester) and in Prague (in the summer semester). Both case studies will be developed in collaboration with local partners – ArchitecturApotheke, architecture collective from Leipzig http://www.architekturapotheke.de/index.html and Archip, architecture institute in Prague http://www.archip.eu/.

Leipzig and Prague has many abandoned buildings/spaces that could be brought back to life by citizens´ engagements. This project seeks to reintegrate citizens and their city by installing a system of transformed building/spaces that will inspire citizens to engage in reusing their city. By mediating between citizens’ urge to collaborate and work together and the city that is providing unused spaces, concept of city commons opens up new understandings of urban collectivities, addressing a range of questions about urban diversity, urban governance, urban belonging, urban sexuality, urban subcultures, and urban poverty.

 Objectives

Project is looking for redesigns of abandoned buildings and left-over plots through which the existing potential or fictional civic organizations, cooperatives and enterprises could take shape. They will have to have the capacity to continually transform and maintain their space by working for the public interest, either by providing cohousing, public services, or by managing cultural and social production.

Transformation of abandoned historical buildings into city commons seeks to protect architecture heritage while looking for innovative proposals in spatial and social organization. It includes buildings/spaces of the lowest category of heritage protection that allows changes of building structure or facade, as well as various extensions and additions. It also includes all those buildings/spaces that are so ruined that they could be demolished and exchanged with the new one of similar size. Transformed buildings/spaces cannot be fully adapted to any conventional typology because of the multiple usage and openness for changing.

Design rational should refer to the following issues:

What is the social process of commoning that would take place through the design?
How would the design be sustained?
What kind of social, cultural or material value would it create for the commoners that use it?
What is the role that architects could have in enabling communities to work together?
How much of the design should be concerned with space itself and how much should it be the organizational structure that allows commoning to take place?

Activities

Wintersemester- Leipzig

Research inquiry - Identify abandoned building/space that could benefit its users better through being collective management or occupation, indicate social  group, collect data, map the processes, make insight into public services, create an infographic

ReDesign engagement – Design for performative, organizational, architectural, and urban, intervention that enables civic organizations and enterprises to enact common rights to transform and use their space productively and collaboratively. Make programmatic diagram, define spatial sequences, imagine architecture diagram, develop prototypes.



Summersemester – Prague

Research inquiry - Identify abandoned building/space that could benefit its users better through being collective management or occupation, indicate social group, collect data, map the processes, make insight into public services, create an infographic

ReDesign engagement – Design for performative, organizational, architectural, and urban, intervention that enables civic organizations and enterprises to enact common rights to use this space productively and collaboratively. Make a programmatic diagram, define spatial sequences, imagine architecture diagram, develop prototypes

Research on abandoned buildings/spaces in the historical center of Prague will be developed during the winter semester at Archip. During the summer semester Archip master students will redesign cases from Leipzig and Prague, while DIA students will work on cases in Pargue. We hope to have stimulative visits and exchange during these parallel activities.







No comments:

Post a Comment